WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 14-01-2021 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Science & Technology ]

      [https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/twitter-jack-dorsey-trump-ban-1.5872700

      Twitter CEO defends Trump ban, acknowledges dangerous precedent
      Donald Trump's account suspended in wake of storming of U.S. Capitol last week
      The Associated Press · Posted: Jan 14, 2021 7:44 AM ET

      Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey defended his company's ban of U.S. President Donald Trump in a philosophical Twitter thread that is his first public statement on the subject.

      When Trump incited his followers to storm the U.S. Capitol last week, then continued to tweet potentially ominous messages, Dorsey said the resulting risk to public safety created an "extraordinary and untenable circumstance" for the company. Having already briefly suspended Trump's account the day of the Capitol riot, Twitter on Friday banned Trump entirely, then smacked down the president's attempts to tweet using other accounts.

      "I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter," Dorsey wrote. But he said: "I believe this was the right decision for Twitter."

      Dorsey acknowledged that shows of strength like the Trump ban could set dangerous precedents, even calling them a sign of "failure." Although not in so many words, Dorsey suggested that Twitter needs to find ways to avoid having to make such decisions in the first place. Exactly how that would work isn't clear, although it could range from earlier and more effective moderation to a fundamental restructuring of social networks.

      In Dorsey-speak, that means Twitter needs to work harder to "promote healthy conversation."

      Extreme measures such as banning Trump also highlight the extraordinary power that Twitter and other Big Tech companies can wield without accountability or recourse, Dorsey wrote.

      Dorsey cautions against too much control by Big Tech
      While Twitter was grappling with the problem of Trump, for instance, Apple, Google and Amazon were effectively shutting down the right-wing site Parler by denying it access to app stores and cloud-hosting services. The companies charged that Parler wasn't aggressive enough about removing calls to violence, which Parler has denied.

      Dorsey declined to criticize his Big Tech counterparts directly, even noting that "this moment in time might call for this dynamic." Over the long term, however, he suggested that aggressive and domineering behaviour could threaten the "noble purpose and ideals" of the open internet by entrenching the power of a few organizations over a commons that should be accessible to everyone.

      The Twitter co-founder, however, had little specific to say about how his platform or other Big Tech companies could avoid such choices in the future. Instead, he touched on an idea that, taken literally, sounds a bit like the end of Twitter itself - a long-term project to develop a technological "standard" that could liberate social networks from centralized control by the likes of Facebook and Twitter.

      But for the moment, Dorsey wrote, Twitter's goal "is to disarm as much as we can, and ensure we are all building towards a greater common understanding, and a more peaceful existence on earth."

      ©2021 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved

       
      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)