WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 08-06-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Britain ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/margolis_jun8.html

      Bush and Blair have some 'splainin' to do
      By ERIC MARGOLIS - Contributing Foreign Editor
      June 8, 2003

      NEW YORK - When I lived in Jamaica, many moons ago, there occurred a bizarre national panic known as "the three-wheeled coffin." According to a storm of rumours, a black, three-wheeled coffin, with three black crows on top, was moving along Jamaica's roads. Villages emptied in terror at reports the coffin was nearing. The three-wheeled coffin was never found. The panic subsided.

      North Americans and Britons have just experienced their own version of the three-wheeled coffin - a national panic attack called Iraq.


      It's becoming increasingly clear the Bush and Blair governments deceived their citizens over Iraq, concocted false information and misled Congress and Parliament. Both administrations face a rising storm of criticism and demands for full-scale inquiries.


      This column has been contacted by a number of retired intelligence officers, both individuals and groups, backing up assertions made here two weeks ago that a cabal of neo-conservatives in President George Bush's administration distorted or faked information that formed the basis of
      claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that imminently threatened the U.S. and all mankind.

      According to MI6 (British intelligence) officers and British press reports, Tony Blair's government was fed this same tainted information and even sent orders to MI6 to make it "sexier."


      Former British foreign secretary Robin Cook, who resigned to protest the Bush-Blair war on Iraq, calls the intelligence reports used to justify the aggression "wrong" and "forged."


      President Bush cited a crudely forged document about uranium sales from Niger to Iraq in his state of the union address. Blair claimed Iraq could attack the West with WMD "within 45 minutes." U.S. Secretary of State
      Colin Powell's UN Philippic against Iraq turned out to be hot air.

      To date, no WMD have been found in Iraq.


      France had the best human intelligence sources in pre-war Iraq. President Jacques Chirac warned Bush and Blair there were no such weapons, and rightly refused to join their illegal invasion of Iraq. Blair foolishly listened to Bush instead of Chirac.


      According to intelligence sources outraged by the corruption and perversion of the national intelligence function for political reasons, the main source of lies and distortions about Iraq was Iraqi exiles, many on the payroll of the U.S. government.


      Phony claims
      These anti-Saddam exiles fed the Pentagon and New York Times a stream of phony claims about Iraqi WMD. Though scorned by the CIA, they were closely linked to American neo-conservatives in key positions within the Bush administration. When the CIA couldn't find hard evidence of Iraqi WMD a new intelligence unit, the Office of Special Plans, was created.

      Intelligence community protests over this blatant politicization of national security were ignored.


      In fact, two more anti-Iraq intel teams, led by Pentagon neo-cons, were set up and all three reportedly fed exaggerated information to Bush and Blair. Similar reports came to Powell.


      Meanwhile, neo-con writers in the American media provided agitprop for the war.


      Many of the senior officials involved were members of the Project for the New American Century, a hawk-ish, far-right group close to Israel's Likud party that in 2000 (prior to 9/11) called for the invasion of Iraq and Iran, and worldwide American dominion.


      Given the lack of WMD in Iraq, these red-faced neo-cons now claim the weapons were moved to Syria and Iran, their next war targets. A few cans of poison or mustard gas and flasks of germs may yet be discovered in Iraq (or, more likely, planted there).


      Even so, these are not weapons of mass destruction. Mustard and nerve gas are battlefield weapons. They are inefficient, and must be dispensed by special aircraft, shells or missiles, none of which Iraq possessed in 2003.


      The U.S. and Britain supplied Iraq with gas and germs in the 1980s for battlefield use against Iran. Napalm and fuel-air explosives kill far more effectively. The only real WMDs are nuclear weapons. The UN long ago confirmed Iraq had none.


      The House intelligence committee's senior Democrat, Jane Harmon, calls Bush's claims about Iraq, "conceivably ... the greatest intelligence hoax of all time." One akin, perhaps, to
      Joseph Goebbel's claim Poland was about to attack Germany in 1939.

      The president of the United States and prime minister of Britain have been accused of lying to their people to embark on a war whose justification appears to have been, as U.S. deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz recently noted, "for bureaucratic reasons."


      Britons are in an uproar. Many Americans, by contrast, seem indifferent. Former president Bill Clinton was impeached by Republicans in Congress for lying about sex.


      President Bush appears to have misled the American people, deceived Congress, violated the UN Charter, blown billions of dollars and many lives - both American and Iraqi - on a phony war, and will likely be re-elected.


      Eric can be reached by e-mail at margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com Letters to the editor should be sent to editor@sunpub.com or visit his home page


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)