WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 21-02-2001 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [Clinton: Money talks and criminals walk
      By ERIC MARGOLIS
      Contributing Foreign Editor
      February 18, 2001

      LOS ANGELES -- William Jefferson Clinton did not leave the White House. He oozed out of it, leaving a trail of reeking corruption that left even his most faithful defenders gagging in revulsion.

      First, to escape prosecution for perjury in the
      Monica Lewinsky case, Clinton admitted lying under oath, had his law licence suspended, and paid a US$25,000 fine. Next, the Clintons made off with $180,000 of White House furnishings, and a truckload of gifts from influence-seekers, including expensive tables from a certain Mrs. Denise Rich.

      Then, at midnight on his last day in office, Clinton pardoned 140 criminals. Drug dealers formed the largest number, followed by mail fraudsters, assorted crooks, even a con-man I had encountered a decade ago.


      Among the felons Clinton pardoned were his
      cocaine-dealing brother, Roger; Whitewater business partner and sometime former lover, Susan McDougal; and the disgraced former CIA director, John Deutch. McDougal's refusal to testify to Whitewater investigators saved Bill and Hillary Clinton from indictment for fraud. Charges against Deutch have not been fully revealed.

      Clinton pardoned four men from a Hassidic community in upstate New York who had swindled the U.S. government of millions. By sheer coincidence,
      Hillary Clinton won that community's votes in her Senate race.

      So far, so bad. Then came the
      Marc Rich bombshell. Clinton rushed through a pardon for Rich, a fugitive billionaire financier who was on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list. Rich, and his partner fled to Switzerland in 1983 as U.S. federal prosecutors were about to arrest them for massive fraud, tax evasion, and illegal arms and oil deals with Iran, Iraq and Libya.

      A note of full disclosure: I am acquainted with both Marc Rich and his former wife, Denise, and was recently a guest at her three-storey penthouse on Fifth Ave. in New York.


      Marc Rich is a brilliant, charming man who radiates intelligence. The last time I met Rich was in Marbella, Spain, sporting a beautiful new wife. Ex-wife Denise, a songwriter, is a warm, gregarious woman who is fast becoming the queen bee of New York's liberal cultural glitterati set.


      Denise Rich contributed $1 million to the Democratic party and, recently, $450,000 to the new Clinton Library.

      Some of this money may have come from Marc, who reportedly transferred funds into his wife's name before fleeing the U.S. Denise denies these donations influenced Clinton's 12th-hour decision to pardon Marc. But when called to testify about the pardon before Congress, she took the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.


      'Suffering in exile'
      Marc Rich mounted an international campaign to win a pardon. He even got Prime Minister Ehud Barak of Israel to lobby for him, as well as the head of Mossad, who said Rich had often helped Israel's intelligence agency. Rich claimed he deserved a pardon by the U.S., whose citizenship he had renounced, and whose taxes he evaded, because he had given many millions to Israeli charities. Denise claimed Marc had been "suffering in exile," while he lived in a lavish Swiss estate.

      Even ardent Democrats couldn't defend Clinton's latest disgraceful behaviour. As indignation swept across the U.S., federal prosecutors opened a criminal investigation into Clinton's pardon of Rich. Proving bribery is extremely difficult. Clinton, who has nimbly skirted the law throughout his career, will probably escape conviction yet again.


      Frankly, I don't blame the Riches if they tried to buy a pardon from the everything's-for-sale Clintons. So many others bought the Clintons, why shouldn't they? There was the amazing $100,000 Hillary made overnight in futures trading, courtesy of an Arkansas chicken producer.


      Bill and Hillary's rich liberal friends in Hollywood, provided the lion's share of Democratic party funding in exchange for U.S. political support and a couple of billion in extra aid for Israel. All those mysterious Chinese gentlemen with cash-stuffed envelopes, producing trade concessions and U.S. missile technology for China, said "thank you" to Bill. A $1 million donation from Indian-Americans tilted U.S. policy toward India.


      The list goes on and on
      For the Clintons, politics has always been a giant cash cow.

      Before coming to Washington, Gov. Clinton of Arkansas had few assets and earned less than a good secretary does in New York. Today, the Clintons have somehow become multi-millionaires on an after-tax, annual presidential salary of about $125,000, in spite of millions of dollars of legal expenses. They accomplished this feat, let's use the right term, by peddling influence.


      Former president
      Ronald Reagan granted 180 pardons over two terms in office. Most were for patriotic government officials. George Bush Sr. pardoned patriots like Casper Weinberger and other Iran-Contra players. These were patriots, not felons. By contrast, Clinton's pardons, mainly for crooks and sleazy cronies, say volumes about the character of this disreputable man who manages, even now, to dishonour the presidency.

      If
      Osama Bin Laden had the good sense to contribute a few million dollars to the Clinton Library, he would now probably be lunching with Bill and Hillary in Manhattan, instead of hiding in the frigid mountains of Afghanistan.

      Eric can be reached by e-mail at margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com Letters to the editor should be sent to editor@sunpub.com


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)