WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 17-02-2002 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?/news/2002/02/16/cameras_020216

      Public cameras worry privacy watchdog
      Last Updated Sun Feb 17 00:16:50 2002

      HAMILTON - Federal Privacy Commissioner George Radwanski is urging Canadians to oppose a campaign to install video surveillance equipment on the streets of more cities.

      Many police forces like the idea of having cameras perched on street lamps or buildings to help them spot crimes being committed, or to catch suspects on the loose. The RCMP already use electronic surveillance in downtown Kelowna, B.C., and there is talk of setting up cameras in communities from Whitehorse to Toronto.

      Canada's privacy commissioner has begun travelling across the country, warning people about what they may be losing if cameras are put in place. "If we cannot walk about the streets of our cities, going about our law-abiding business, without being under the constant, systematic observation through video surveillance cameras by agents of the state, we are not truly free," Radwanski says.

      People in an Ontario city that's considering cameras, Hamilton, appear divided over the idea. "I think it's a good proposal," says one man. "The crime rate is a little higher in the downtown Hamilton area.

      "I understand putting cameras in private places," says a woman. "But I think it's crossing the line once you're installing cameras on public streets, and watching innocent people doing their everyday activities."

      Even though many police officers like the cameras, the equipment doesn't deter crime, the commissioner argues. Citing statistics from Britain, he says the crime rate in London has gone up despite the installation of thousands of cameras on streets and in subways.

      "The problem is, it's a fake solution," according to Radwanski. "Most of the crime occurs at night. Streets are dark. The chances of those cameras even getting a good enough image to produce a positive identification aren't huge."

      Under current law, municipalities decide for themselves if they want to install cameras. Radwanski thinks there should be a national policy in place, but first he must convince MPs about the danger that sweeping use of electronic surveillance poses.

      Written by CBC News Online staff


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)