WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 24-05-2000 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [Prosecutor drops case against Linda Tripp
      Wednesday, May. 24, 2000

      Linda Tripp, the former Pentagon employee secret tape recordings of former White House intern Monica Lewinsky triggered a criminal investigation of President Clinton, talks to reporters outside federal court in Washington on July 29, 1998.

      Prosecutors dismissed Maryland's wiretapping case against Tripp saying a judge's decision severely limiting Monica Lewinsky's testimony gutted their case Wednesday, May 24, 2000, in Baltimore. (AP Photo/Khue Bui, File)

      BALTIMORE (AP) -- Maryland prosecutors dropped their wiretapping charges against Linda Tripp on Wednesday saying they were left with no case after a judge barred most testimony from the star witness, Monica Lewinsky.

      Tripp, whose recordings of her rambling and ribald conversations with the former White House intern set in motion the events that nearly brought down U.S. President Bill Clinton, was the only major figure in the scandal to face criminal charges.

      But State Prosecutor Stephen Montanarelli said the judge's ruling left him unable to prove that Tripp recorded a telephone conversation with Lewinsky without her consent in December 1997.

      "There are no other witnesses to the conversation whom the state can call to testify and Tripp cannot be compelled to testify," Montanarelli said.


      If convicted, Tripp could have faced 10 years in prison and a $20,000 US fine.


      Tripp, who has called the case politically motivated, had no immediate comment.


      Prosecutors had to build a case against Tripp that did not rely on evidence she gave to independent counsel
      Kenneth Starr's office while she was under a federal grant of immunity from prosecution.

      Earlier this month, Judge Diane Leasure disallowed most of Lewinsky's testimony saying it was not credible and was tainted by the Starr investigation. Leasure ruled that Lewinsky's recollection of the date of the conversation was influenced by her contact with Starr's office.


      The prosecutor asked the judge to reconsider, but she refused.


      Montanarelli said Lewinsky did not need Starr's office to refresh her memory of the conversation.


      "This was an extremely important and memorable event in her life which was, shortly after it occurred, published in detail in the national news media," Montanarelli said. "We believe her, the court does not, and that resolves the matter."


      Lewinsky attorney Plato Cacheris said he agreed with Montanarelli that Lewinsky's recall of the taped conversation was not tainted by Starr's investigation. But he added: "I'm sure Ms. Lewinsky is glad that she doesn't have to come back to Maryland to testify."


      Tripp was charged for taping her conversation with Lewinsky on Dec. 22, 1997, and then allowing her lawyer to play it for Newsweek magazine. Maryland's wiretap law, which is infrequently prosecuted, forbids taping phone conversations without the other party's consent.


      Disclosure of the tape and others Tripp secretly recorded gave Starr evidence of a sexual relationship between Lewinsky and Clinton. That evidence was used as the basis for the impeachment trial against the president.


      Tripp and Lewinsky became friends while working together at the Pentagon, and Lewinsky later told Tripp about her sexual encounters with the president.


      Tripp said she began taping her friend's phone calls to protect herself, because Lewinsky was pressuring her to deny knowledge of the relationship in an affidavit for Paula Jones' sexual harassment case against Clinton.


      Lucianne Goldberg, the New York literary agent who suggested to Tripp that she tape the conversations, said after Wednesday's ruling that she was "just thrilled for Linda."


       "She has been through such an extraordinary and unfair ordeal," Goldberg said. "This has eaten up two years of her life and her biggest crime was telling the truth."



      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)