WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 04-01-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Peru ]

      [http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/world/1724384

      Peru court throws out anti-terror measures
      Associated Press
      Jan. 3, 2003, 11:42PM

      LIMA, Peru - A Peruvian court struck down anti-terror laws Friday that had been used to quash rebel movements in the 1990s, a decision that could bring new trials for many people imprisoned on terror charges. The Constitutional Tribunal's ruling followed an examination of four decrees approved by former President Alberto Fujimori.

      The crackdown measures, including harsh prison sentences and the use of hooded military tribunals, were popular with many Peruvians who had grown tired of more than a decade of bloody, rebel insurgencies. But they drew international criticism for their secrecy and lack of due process.

      Among other findings, the court declared the use of military tribunals to try civilians unconstitutional, which could open the way for civilian trials for some 900 people tried in military courts, including Shining Path founder Abimael Guzman. "It doesn't order a new trial, but it opens the possibility," court president Javier Alva said, referring to Guzman.

      But Alva said the ruling should not affect the case of imprisoned American Lori Berenson, who is serving a 20-year sentence in a Peru prison for terrorist collaboration. A military court originally sentenced Berenson to life in 1996 for a failed plot to overthrow Peru's Congress. She was retried in civilian court in 2001 on the lesser collaboration charge. Peru's high court upheld the decision last year. Alva said Berenson has exhausted her legal options in Peru.

      On Thursday, Fujimori criticized the expected ruling. He has been living in Japan since he fled Peru amid a corruption scandal that toppled his decade-long regime in 2000. "It seems the current government has forgotten that hell, has forgotten the 30,000 people killed by barbaric terrorism," he said in a videotaped statement released by press representatives in Lima.

      By the early 1990s, guerrillas had virtually driven the Peruvian government to its knees with a campaign of car bombings, political assassinations and massacres of peasant communities that refused to support them.

      Addressing a common concern among Peruvians that a wave of dangerous terrorists may soon hit the streets, Alva said the ruling will not set rebels free and does not disqualify evidence used in the secretive trials. Instead, the court has directed Peru's Congress to create new laws that will allow life sentences to be reviewed upon petition.

      Alva said Friday's decision brings Peru in line with rulings by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the legal arm of the Organization of American States. The Inter-American court has directed Peru to reform its anti-terrorism legislation.

      Fujimori passed the authoritarian measures in 1992 to protect magistrates from rebel reprisals. Before the secret courts, rebel death threats made some judges afraid to deliver guilty verdicts.

      Violence abated with Guzman's 1992 capture, and the Shining Path - some 10,000 strong at its strongest - has dwindled to about 500 guerrillas today.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)