WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 27-01-2001 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [Porn Site Operators Fear Bush Administration
      By Doug Brown and Randy Barrett

      The inauguration of President George W. Bush and the likely confirmation of John Ashcroft as Attorney General have anti-pornography forces rejoicing and adult-site operators nervous.

      The last eight years have been very good to the cyberporn industry. The Clinton administration took no action against online smut sites despite ample state and federal obscenity laws.

      "The obscenity laws were not being enforced; they were never enforced on the Net, and the producers are saying, 'Let's get more graphic and explicit because we have a green light from [former Attorney General Janet] Reno,' " said antiporn advocate Donna Rice Hughes. "We need a message loud and clear saying: 'You know what? This has got to stop. And if it doesn't, you've got to pay the piper.' "

      Pornography has not been a central issue for Ashcroft during his long career in public service, although he did attack his Democratic opponent in the Senate race this year, Gov. Mel Carnahan - who died in a plane crash during the campaign - for accepting campaign donations from Playboy chief Christie Hefner.

      But pornography is an issue over which the Department of Justice has jurisdiction, and the degree to which obscenity and other pornography-related laws are pursued by the federal government depends, at least in part, on the attorney general's agenda. In addition, the DOJ has a $5 million budget set aside specifically to enforce obscenity laws.

      "Half the [adult] sites on the Web are illegal," said Parry Aftab, executive director at online safety group Cyberangels, who expects much stricter enforcement under the Bush administration.

      Crystal Roberts, legal policy analyst at the Family Research Council, hopes Aftab is right. "Vigorous enforcement of obscenity laws is something that the Bush-Cheney administration is going to be stronger on than the Clinton administration," she predicted.

      The online porn industry isn't happy about the turn of events. Most adult-site owners don't wish to speak out publicly against Ashcroft or Bush for fear of retribution under the new regime.

      Bob Kim, vice president and counsel at adult-site operator Flying Crocodile, expects more scrutiny from Bush and Ashcroft. "We are concerned, but there's not much we can do about it," he said.

      While states have their own obscenity laws, the federal government has a three-part test in defining what is and isn't obscene. The first, and most problematic, measure asks whether material is offensive when applied to "contemporary community standards." The second test asks whether such material breaks state statutes, and the third asks whether the material has any "literary, artistic, political or scientific value."

      It was a slippery slope that the Clinton camp chose not to hike on. Most of the outgoing administration's Web enforcement efforts focused on more obvious hacking.

      Aftab said adult sites should expect trouble. "We all know it's going to come down in a more conservative environment," Aftab said


      World Fact Book (CIA)]
      Cross-Indexed:

      New document Icon


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)