WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 14-11-2020 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ China ]

      [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/china-crows-about-coronavirus-orderliness-versus-the-wests-chaos

      China crows about coronavirus ‘orderliness’ versus ‘the West’s chaos’
      by Joel Gehrke, Foreign Affairs Reporter | | November 13, 2020 04:26 PM

      China has used Western struggles with the coronavirus pandemic to help avoid domestic political backlash against Beijing, according to the security official tasked with maintaining regime stability.

      “During the pandemic, we seized important achievements in a short time and have posed a great contrast between ‘China’s orderliness’ and ‘the West’s chaos,’” Politburo member Guo Shengkun wrote in a new book of articles published by the Chinese Communist Party.

      That statement calls attention to how Beijing regards the coronavirus pandemic as an opportunity to gain credibility at home at the expense of the democratic nations, an effort that stands to benefit from the resurgence of the coronavirus in Europe and the United States.

      Guo’s reflection illuminates one aspect of a broader messaging strategy that seeks to argue that Chinese Communist rule is more efficient than Western systems of government.

      “With its magical power, the ‘Five-Year Plan’ has ushered in more and more surprises to China and the world, bringing out the unique and tremendous charm of the Chinese system and Chinese governance,” Chinese vice minister of civil affairs Zhan Chengfu wrote last month, according to the China Media Project. “While China is drawing up plans for the next generation, Western countries are planning only for the next election.”

      Chinese officials have defended their political system in comparison to the Western democratic model from the early days of the pandemic, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi argued that Beijing’s implementation of strict lockdowns to contain the pandemic displayed “the advantage of China's system” at the Munich Security Conference in February.

      “The West needs to eschew the subconscious belief in the superiority of its civilization and abandon its prejudices and anxieties regarding China,” he said.

      Still, Guo’s boast accompanies an acknowledgment that Chinese Communist officials also fear that “the backdrop of U.S.-China confrontation” could set the table for the instability of the regime on the mainland.

      “Conventional and unconventional security challenges are on the rise, they are now more overlapped, interconnected, penetrating and can be easily magnified,” wrote Guo, the regime’s domestic security chief, according to the South China Morning Post. “[They] could constitute systemic risks if not handled properly.”

      That comment exposes the motive for arresting the Chinese academics who criticized the party bureaucracy’s initial response to the emergence of the coronavirus pandemic. The dissidents anchored their rebuke in the way party officials censored and punished the doctors who first tried to warn about the emergence of a novel coronavirus.

      “It only shows that the government’s long-term tight control of society and people has almost completely destroyed the organization and self-help capabilities of Chinese society,” Shanghai-based constitutional scholar Zhang Xuezhong wrote in May.

      Zhang and other dissident intellectuals were detained following such criticisms for varying lengths of time before being released, but Chinese officials have begun targeting the activists who promote their work.

      “Anyone who helps dissidents to contact journalists, lawyers, or offer help to their families will be prosecuted,” Chinese human rights activist Hu Jia told Voice of America, a U.S.-funded media outlet. "So many people have been ‘disappeared,’ or invited to ‘drink tea,’ or just locked up.”

      Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and other senior U.S. officials have amplified the complaints about censorship levied by internal dissidents. White House deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger argued that central government was directly responsible for the censorship in a speech earlier this year delivered in Mandarin.

      Chinese officials protested that U.S. officials were trying "to drive a wedge between the CPC and the Chinese people," and Guo underscored the importance of defending the Chinese Communist Party’s governance system going forward.

      “[We] must firmly safeguard the state’s political safety, regime safety and ideological safety,” he wrote. “[We] must defend against and strike hard on sabotage, subversion and ‘splittism’ by hostile forces.”

      Copyright 2020. Washington Examiner. All Rights Reserved.


      World Fact Book (CIA]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)