WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 21-11-2025 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [https://nationalpost.com/news/world/us-ukraine-russia-peace-plan

      Latest U.S. peace plan for Ukraine expected to be ‘dead on arrival’ as it grant key Russian demands
      Under the plan, the Ukrainian regions of Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk would be ‘recognized as de facto Russian.” Ukraine would also be required to give up hope of NATO membership
      Natalia Drozdiak, Alex Wickham and Daryna Krasnolutska
      Bloomberg News Published Nov 20, 2025

      A 28-point peace plan floated by U.S. and Russian envoys would force Ukraine to cede large chunks of territory taken by Russia, cap the size of its military and lift sanctions on Moscow over time, acceding to many of President Vladimir Putin’s wartime demands.

      Under the terms of the plan, the Ukrainian regions of Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk would be “recognized as de facto Russian, including by the United States,” according to the proposal, a copy of which was seen by Bloomberg News. Ukraine would also be required to hold elections in 100 days and give up any hope of NATO membership.

      Ukraine would receive a U.S. security guarantee — albeit one that Washington would be compensated for. The U.S. would also get 50 per cent of profits to rebuild and invest in Ukraine, and enter an economic partnership with Russia once sanctions are lifted.

      Many details of the plan are proposals that have been vehemently rejected by Ukraine and its allies in the past. While President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he was reviewing the idea, there’s little indication he would be prepared to accept many of its terms. Members of NATO will also object given that the plan would curtail the alliance’s ability to expand as it sees fit. Such a move would need the buy-in of all 32 of its members.

      “It bothers me how little effort has gone into it,” Julianne Smith, former President Joe Biden’s ambassador to NATO, said in an interview. “It’s going to be declared dead on arrival by a whole host of people, starting with Zelenskyy himself.

      He’s careful right now, he’s saying that he’s reviewing it, but I don’t see any circumstances where he would be prepared to accept a plan like this.”

      The latest proposal was worked out between President Donald Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev, according to people familiar with the matter. It follows past Witkoff efforts that Ukraine has been wary of and faced almost immediate opposition from Europe.

      Axios published the text of the plan earlier Thursday. The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

      While White House officials said the plan had Trump’s backing, one person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations, said conversations remain fluid. A delegation of top U.S. military officials, led by Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, was in Kyiv this week discussing avenues for progress, and options include ramping up military support, the person said.

      Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has taken a harder line toward Russia than Witkoff has, said negotiators would “continue to develop a list of potential ideas for ending this war based on input from both sides of this conflict.”

      But the scale of the concessions to Moscow — as well as the U.S. — is massive, and would need buy-in from other countries not involved in the latest discussions. Not only would Ukraine have to promise not to join NATO — it would have to enshrine such a vow in its constitution. Russia would be brought back into the Group of Eight nations, a symbolic move that would end its international isolation and is opposed by other members of the group.

      It also proposes giving the U.S. a financial cut. Some US$100 billion in Russian frozen assets would go toward U.S.-led efforts to rebuild the country, with the U.S. getting 50 per cent of the profit. Unspent frozen assets would go into a U.S.-Russian investment fund.

      It’s not clear how much leeway Zelenskyy has to push back against the plan, or whether the U.S. will use its supplies of weapons and intelligence as leverage to push Kyiv to accept. Trump’s national security team has engaged with both Russian and Ukrainian officials and the president supports the current plan, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday.

      “I’m not going to litigate the details of this plan as it’s ongoing and it’s in flux, but the president supports this plan,” she said. “It’s a good plan for both Russia and Ukraine, and we believe that it should be acceptable to both sides.”

      The response from Ukraine’s allies has been swift — and negative. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said any proposal for a peace agreement with Russia must have Ukraine’s consent. So did Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis.

      “A lot of the points that I saw are quite problematic,” Mitsotakis said in an interview with Bloomberg News Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait at the New Economy Forum in Singapore. “We’ve also made it quite clear that at the end of the day, the most important security guarantee for Ukraine is a strong Ukrainian army.”

      His remarks echoed Europe’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, who said that any attempt to bring peace to Ukraine must involve Kyiv.

      While the document gives Russia much of what it wants, some vague limits would be imposed on Russia. It would be expected not to invade other countries and enshrine non-aggression toward Europe into law.

      — With assistance from Romy Varghese

      © 2025 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited


      World Fact Book (CIA)]]]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)