WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 27-10-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/10/25/237105-ap.html
       
      U.S. leaders offering their people war without end
      By MATT KELLEY
      Sat, October 25, 2003

      WASHINGTON (AP) - Given the chance to talk with the U.S. defence secretary, one solider asked what was on the minds of many: when will the worldwide fight against terrorism be over?

      "I mean, should I get my three-year-old ready for air-assault school?" the soldier asked Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld during an Iraq tour last month.

      "I wish I could give you a date but I can't," Rumsfeld said.

      That would be like estimating when a town will no longer need firefighters or police, he told the soldier.

      Privately, U.S. administration officials have said for months they see the anti-terrorism fight as a decades-long struggle similar to the Cold War that dominated the second half of the 20th century. A private memo from Rumsfeld to his top aides brought the issue once again to the public's eye last week.

      "It is pretty clear that the coalition can win in Afghanistan and Iraq in one way or another but it will be a long, hard slog," Rumsfeld wrote in the memo, which was leaked to the news media.

      Two years after the Sept. 11 attacks, the Pentagon clearly is digging in for that long slog. In one of the most striking signs, the military is repositioning its forces to encircle areas of the world seen as possible hotbeds of terrorism.

      Many of the changes were envisioned before the Sept. 11 attacks. But the terrorism fight has added momentum and urgency.
      Rumsfeld's memo expressed doubt those changes can be made quickly.

      "It is not possible to change DoD (Department of Defence) fast enough to successfully fight the global war on terror; an alternative might be to try to fashion a new institution," Rumsfeld wrote.

      Some of the most visible changes involve where U.S. troops will be based overseas.

      Pentagon planners are considering moving some of the 116,000 troops under the U.S. European Command away from their Cold War bases in Western Europe and into former Warsaw Pact countries closer to the Middle East.

      "We think we have a fairly good, rough sense about how we should be arranged in the world," Rumsfeld told soldiers at Fort Carson, Colo., this month.

      Last month, the U.S. army announced it will close two logistics bases in the Netherlands that had handled prepositioned military gear.

      Officials in Romania and Bulgaria have said the United States is considering using huge training bases in those countries that could be used as staging points for military action.

      "This is probably the closest point in Europe to the sort of threat which is centred in the areas of Central Asia" or the Persian Gulf, Romanian Defence Minister Ioan Mircea Pascu said.

      Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have joined NATO. Romania, Bulgaria and five other former communist countries are in the process of joining the alliance. Eastern European countries - which Rumsfeld termed "New Europe" this year - are eager to help the United States and generally supported the war in Iraq.

      Poland, for example, commands a division of troops in Iraq, which also includes troops from Ukraine, Bulgaria, Romania and other former communist countries. The United States used a base in Hungary to train Iraqi exiles who accompanied U.S. troops into Iraq and is reported to have plans to train Iraqi police there.

      Germany, host to about 80,000 U.S. troops and the headquarters of the U.S. European Command, opposed the Iraq invasion. On the other hand, Germany sent troops to Afghanistan and once led the peacekeeping force in Kabul.

      U.S. forces are using bases in the former Soviet republics Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia to help fight the war in Afghanistan. Those bases could be used even after fighting is over in Afghanistan.

      The U.S. military also has stationed a task force of marines and other troops in the African country Djibouti to have a presence in the Horn of Africa, another possible terrorist site across the Red Sea from Saudi Arabia.

      In Southeast Asia, U.S. forces also have trained the Philippine military to fight al-Qaida-linked guerrillas and sought to bolster the U.S. military position in the region.

      Repositioning U.S. forces is part of what Pentagon officials call forward defence. The idea is to have troops on hand to go after terrorists where they congregate and strike them before they can attack the United States.

      Putting U.S. troops on the front lines exposes them to attack, however and Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders have told their followers to attack Americans in Iraq. U.S. forces now face about 25 attacks a day there, from supporters of Saddam Hussein and Islamic extremists.

      "Here's a place they can come and fight Americans," said Col. Jackson Flake, chief of staff for the U.S. army's 1st Armored Division in Baghdad.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)