WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 03-01-2020 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/towhey-attack-on-irans-terror-chief-justifiable

      Attack on Iran's terror chief justifiable
      Mark Towhey
      Published: January 3, 2020

      Iran’s “Terrorist-in-Chief,” Gen. Qasem Soleimani was killed in an overnight explosion in Iraq on Friday.

      The U.S. administration confirms the explosion was the result of an American rocket attack.

      While the reaction among many anti-U.S. and anti-Donald Trump personalities on social media was predictable (outrage) and apoplectic (the end of days), the truth is a bit more pedestrian

      Soleimani was the commander-in-chief of Iran’s Quds Force - officially the “international wing” of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps.

      Why does Iran’s Revolutionary Guard need an international wing? To direct and execute terrorist operations abroad, of course.

      As the man calling the shots in Iran’s long-lasting and ongoing international terror operations, Soleimani was a righteous target.

      Making him even more so was the fact he was killed in Baghdad less than two days after rocket attacks against the U.S. embassy there killed an American.

      Why was Soleimani in Baghdad - the capital city of Iran’s greatest regional nemesis - at the time?

      The New Year’s Eve attack on U.S. diplomats and their security forces is generally being blamed on Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) - directly or indirectly, through complicity.

      Although the PMF are nominally part of Iraq’s security infrastructure, they are Shia militias overtly backed by Iran - a de facto arm of the Quds Force Soleimani commands.

      Will this unleash an immediate backlash from Iran? No doubt.

      But, it’s important to remember this targeted attack against the mastermind of Iran’s international terror operations was the retaliation - not the provocation.

      Iran has been poking the American bear with increasingly sharp sticks for some time, teasing out where the line in the sand might be.

      Thursday night they found it.

      Was this an illegal attack, as some Henny Pennys on Twitter claim? No.

      Soleimani is a combatant, not a politician. He commands the Iranian unit directly responsible for multiple attacks on the U.S. and its western allies. That makes him a bonafide military target.

      He is not the equivalent of U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence - a civilian politician. Soleimani is a military general and a combatant.

      There is no U.S. prohibition on this direct action. Nor does it violate international laws of armed combat.

      In the U.S., only Congress can declare war. But recent American law has established the president can order drone strikes against targets in foreign countries. President Barack Obama was the first to do so on an industrial scale.

      U.S. law prohibits the assassination of a foreign leader. But, once again, Soleimani was not a head of state - even if he once bragged to an American general he was more powerful than Iran’s president.

      One thing is certain.

      Whoever takes Soleimani’s place as Iran’s new terror chief - and all those working under him - will have some sleepless nights now that it’s been demonstrated they are not safe from the consequences of their actions.

      mtowhey@postmedia.com
      © 2020 Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)