WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 13-12-2002 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Iraq ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2002/12/13/7267-ap.html

      IAEA chief: Iraq nuke dossier is old material
      By SUSANNA LOOF - Associated Press
      Fri, December 13, 2002

      VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Most of Iraq's nuclear weapons declaration to the United Nations is old material, and only 300 pages in Arabic are believed to contain any new information, the chief of the U.N. atomic energy agency said Friday.

      Mohamed ElBaradei, director-general of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency in charge of hunting for nuclear arms in Iraq, said 2,100 of the dossier's 2,400 pages "is material we already had before."

      His assessment came as U.S. officials accused Iraq of failing to account for a number of missing chemical and biological weapons in its overall 12,000-page arms declaration, which includes the 2,400 pages the
      IAEA is analyzing.

      The report appears to skip over purchases that U.S. intelligence believe are related to
      Saddam Hussein's nuclear program, officials in Washington said Thursday.

      "Iraq has said they have not taken part in any nuclear weapons activities. We are far from reaching a conclusion on that matter," ElBaradei said. "Of course we must verify that statement. The process will take time but you need to bear with us because if successful, this is the best way of ensuring that Iraq disarms - and could spare innocent lives."


      Briefing reporters at IAEA headquarters in Vienna, ElBaradei said even the 300 Arabic pages - which cover Iraqi activities from 1991-2002 - contain information familiar to the agency. Its analysis was continuing, he said.


      "We expect that by next Tuesday, we will provide the Security Council with a sanitized copy of that report. ... We are sanitizing that report and we are doing detailed analysis," he said. By sanitizing, ElBaradei said, he meant removing sensitive information that might lead to nuclear proliferation.


      Despite his agency's push for preliminary findings and a quick analysis of Iraq's declaration, "it will take us something like a year before we can come to any credible conclusion," ElBaradei cautioned.


      Iraq has said it has no
      weapons of mass destruction. Inspectors with the IAEA and the New York-based U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission have been fanning out across the country in search of nuclear, biological or chemical agents and the means to produce them.

      "Iraq claims they have not been involved in any proscribed activities in the last four years. We cannot take that statement at face value," ElBaradei said, adding that further inspections were necessary to confirm or refute Baghdad's insistence that it poses no threat.


      The U.N. inspections have resumed under a new Security Council resolution requiring Iraq to report on nuclear, biological, chemical and missile research and production. It filed that 12,000-page U.N. declaration last weekend; the IAEA is analyzing the 2,400-page nuclear portion.

      The latest U.N. resolution also mandates that Iraq surrender any weapons of mass destruction, which it denies having. The U.S. government says it is sure Baghdad retains such weapons, and threatens war if Iraq fails, in Washington's view, to comply with U.N. disarmament demands.


      American intelligence experts were comparing their conclusions with experts from other countries on the Security Council, and a Council meeting was planned for next Thursday.


      The Iraqi report largely rehashes old declarations and reports and contains little new information, officials said. It has done nothing to alter the U.S. belief that Iraq possesses chemical and biological weapons and is pursuing nuclear weapons, officials said.


      More important than what Iraq put in the declaration is what it left out, an official said.


      The report, being analyzed at the CIA and elsewhere, does not account for quantities of chemical and biological agents that were missing when U.N. inspectors were expelled from Iraq in 1998, officials said. Hundreds of mustard gas shells, for example, remain unaccounted for, officials said.


      It also does not explain a number of Iraqi acquisitions that the United States suspects are related to Saddam's nuclear program, officials said. This includes the purchase of uranium in Africa, as well as purchases in Western countries of high-tech equipment that could be used in a uranium enrichment program, officials said. Enriched uranium or plutonium is a necessary requirement for a nuclear weapon.


      In a round of inspections in the 1990s, after Iraq's defeat in the 1991 Gulf War, the United Nations destroyed tons of Iraqi chemical and biological weapons and dismantled Iraq's nuclear weapons program.


      ElBaradei said the United States should hand over the "solid evidence" the Bush administration claims it has that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction. The U.N. resolution urges all member states to share relevant information.


      "We need the information. Information is the key to success," he said.


      ElBaradei said inspectors were talking to Iraqi scientists and would consider doing so outside the country "if they feel more comfortable being interviewed outside of Iraq."



      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)