WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 26-09-2025 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-ukraine-reversal-1.7644226

      Trump's Ukraine pivot: Backing away, or backing a winner?
      Ukraine has shown its resolve to stay in the fight for years
      Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: Sep 26, 2025 4:00 AM EDT

      The Trump administration appears to be behind Ukraine, as long as there's something in it for the United States.

      That seems to be the growing consensus among European politicians, diplomats, experts and editorial writers.

      On the one hand, there's a growing number of voices who say they believe U.S. President Donald Trump's stunning pivot this week toward backing Ukraine is nothing more than crass politics and image management in the face of a flailing peace process.

      Others say it actually signals Washington is deliberately taking a step back from the long-running war and the peace process that Trump started.

      "It seems to me like he's walking away and handing the key to the car to the Europeans," said Matthew Schmidt, an Eastern Europe expert at the University of New Haven, Conn.

      "I think Trump is driven by a desire to win a Nobel Peace Prize and by extreme embarrassment at failure … I think that this is saying, 'I don't think I can win this. I don't want to risk losing it and have that attached to me.'"
      Trump provided no rationale for the change in direction.

      In his social media declaration on Tuesday, Trump said he now believes Ukraine could probably take back all of its territory conquered by Russia with Europe's help.

      He was praised up and down the political spectrum.

      Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy went so far as to say Trump was "well informed" and that he clearly understands the situation on the battlefield.

      The remarks are light years away from the tense confrontation in the Oval Office last winter that saw Trump declare Ukraine didn't have any "cards" and needed to make territorial concessions.

      Trump had famously boasted he could end the war in 24 hours and went on this summer to host Russian President Vladimir Putin in a made-for-TV summit in Alaska.

      Not much has come, so far, from the vaulted peace effort.

      Several European leaders cheered Trump's about-face, but Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, writing on social media, said Trump's apparent backing of Ukraine is being misinterpreted.

      "President Trump has stated that Ukraine could, with the support of the European Union, regain all of its territory. This surprising optimism conceals a promise of reduced U.S. involvement and a shift of responsibility for ending the war to Europe," Tusk wrote in a post on Wednesday.
      "Truth is better than illusion."

      There is another, somewhat more charitable — if not mercantile — view. Increasing U.S. economic interest in Ukraine's critical minerals sector and the ongoing negotiating of an up to $30-billion drone deal, which will directly benefit the U.S. military, could be behind the president's about-face.

      Zelenskyy, in his speech to the United Nations, said his country is willing to share its drone know-how in partnerships with Western nations.
      The U.S. has had very little to say about the negotiations. However, Zelenskyy, prior to his appearance at the UN, said Ukraine has put forward a draft agreement for discussion. It is expected to cover investments in Ukraine's drone production, joint or co‑production agreements and weapon purchases from the U.S.

      Last summer, Canada signed a joint drone production partnership with Ukraine.

      Schmidt said he doesn't subscribe to the notion that Trump is being motivated by the economic or military benefits of closer co-operation with Ukraine. He also disputes the president's view that Ukraine's fate is in Europe's hands — as long as it continues to recruit members into the military and receive high-end air defence capabilities.

      "Ukraine is doing a lot now and it's quite self-sufficient," Schmidt said. "It has figured out how to produce the weapons, train the drone pilots. It has, I think, competence, strategic command."

      That competence and strategic thinking has been on display since the end of August when Ukraine launched its campaign targeting Russian oil refineries. The drone strikes are estimated to have disabled roughly 17 per cent, or one-sixth, of Russia's oil-refining capacity.

      Several published reports have suggested on some days, refining output is down by as much as 20 per cent.

      The attacks have disrupted processing at large, strategic refineries like Ryazan, Volgograd and Salavat, which have reduced the volume of refined petroleum products available both domestically in Russia and for export.

      Murray Brewster is senior defence writer for CBC News, based in Ottawa. He has covered the Canadian military and foreign policy from Parliament Hill for over a decade. Among other assignments, he spent a total of 15 months on the ground covering the Afghan war for The Canadian Press. Prior to that, he covered defence issues and politics for CP in Nova Scotia for 11 years and was bureau chief for Standard Broadcast News in Ottawa.


      ©2025 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved


      World Fact Book (CIA)]]]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)