WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 22-09-2004 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2004/09/16/632071-ap.html

      U.S. inspector concludes Iraq had no WMDs
      September 16, 2004

      WASHINGTON (AP) - Drafts of a report from the top U.S. inspector in Iraq conclude there were no weapons stockpiles, but there were signs deposed Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had dormant programs he hoped to revive at a later time, said people familiar with the findings.

      In a 1,500-page report, the head of the Iraq Survey Group, Charles Duelfer, will find Saddam was importing banned materials, working on unmanned aerial vehicles in violation of UN agreements and maintaining a dual-use industrial sector that could produce weapons.

      Duelfer also said Iraq only had small research-and-development programs for chemical and biological weapons.

      As Duelfer puts the finishing touches on his report, he concludes Saddam had intentions of restarting weapons programs at some point, after suspicion and inspections waned.

      After a year and a half in Iraq, however, the United States has found no weapons of mass destruction - its chief argument for overthrowing the regime.

      An intelligence official said Duelfer could wrap up the report as soon as this month. Those who discussed the report inside and outside the U.S. government did so on the condition of anonymity because it contains classified material and is not yet completed.

      The report is expected to be similar to findings reported by Duelfer's predecessor, David Kay, who presented an interim report to Congress in October. Kay left the post in January, saying: "We were almost all wrong" about Saddam's weapons programs.

      Duelfer's report, however, is expected to fall between the position of President George W. Bush's administration before the war - portraying Saddam as a grave threat - and the declarative statements Kay made after he resigned.

      It will also add more evidence and flesh out Kay's October findings. Then, Kay said the Iraq Survey Group had only uncovered limited evidence of secret chemical and biological weapons programs but he found substantial evidence of an Iraqi push to boost the range of its ballistic missiles beyond prohibited ranges.

      He also said there was almost no sign a significant nuclear weapons project was under way.

      Duelfer's report doesn't reach firm conclusions in all areas. For instance, U.S. officials are still investigating whether Saddam's fallen regime may have sent chemical weapons equipment and several billion dollars over the border to Syria. That has not been confirmed but remains an area of interest to the U.S. government.

      The Duelfer report will come months after the U.S. Senate intelligence committee released a scathing assessment of the pre-war intelligence on Iraq.

      After a yearlong inquiry, the Republican-led committee said in July the CIA kept key information from its own and other agencies' analysts, engaged in "group think" by failing to challenge the assumption Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and allowed Bush and U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell to make false statements.

      The Iraq Survey Group has been working since the summer of 2003 to find Saddam's weapons and better understand his prohibited programs. More than 1,000 civilian and military weapons specialists, translators and other experts have been devoted to the effort.


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)