WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 02-12-2002 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2002/12/02/6094-ap.html

      U.S. court to rule on law banning sex acts
      Mon, December 2, 2002

      WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday it would consider whether states can punish homosexuals for having sex, a case that tests the constitutionality of sodomy laws in 13 states.

      The justices will review the prosecution of two men under a 28-year-old Texas law making it a crime to engage in same-sex intercourse. The Supreme Court has struggled with how much protection the U.S. Constitution offers in the bedroom.

      The court ruled 5-4 in 1986 that consenting adults have no constitutional right to private homosexual sex, upholding laws that ban sodomy.

      The court faces several questions in the latest case. Among them: Is it an unconstitutional invasion of privacy for couples to be prosecuted for what they do in their own homes? Is it unconstitutional for states to treat gays and lesbians differently by punishing them for having sex while allowing heterosexual couples to engage in the same acts without penalties.

      Sodomy is defined as abnormal sex and, in some states, includes oral as well as anal sex. Nine states ban consensual sodomy for everyone: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia.

      Texas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma punish only homosexual sodomy.

      States argue that the laws, some dating back more than 100 years, are intended to preserve public morals. The laws are rarely enforced.

      Lawyers for John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner said the men were bothering no one in 1998 when they were arrested in Lawrence's apartment, jailed overnight and later fined under Texas' Homosexual Conduct Law, which classifies anal or oral sex between two men or two women as deviate sexual intercourse.

      The men's lawyers said the convictions would prevent them from getting certain jobs, and would in some states require them to register as sex offenders.

      They were arrested after police responded to a false report of an armed intruder in Lawrence's apartment. Police entered the unlocked apartment and found the men having sex.

      Lawrence and Garner were fined $200 after pleading no contest to misdemeanour charges.

      "The idea that a state may enter into American bedrooms and closely inspect the most intimate and private physical interactions . . . is a stark affront to fundamental liberty that the court should end," said one of the men's' lawyers, Ruth E. Harlow, legal director of the New York-based Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund.

      Harlow said in court filings that the latest census found more than 600,000 households of same-sex partners in America, including about 43,000 in Texas. She said the Texas law treats gays as second-class citizens.

      William Delmore III, an assistant district attorney in Texas, said people who don't like the law should take it up with the Texas legislature, not the courts.

      He said homosexual sodomy has been considered criminal behaviour for centuries. The conduct "could not conceivably have achieved the status of a fundamental right in the brief period of 16 years" since the Supreme Court last reviewed it, Delmore wrote in the state's court papers.

      Over the past decade, state courts have blocked sodomy laws in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Montana, and Tennessee. But last month, a Louisiana appeals court upheld that state's 197-year-old law banning all oral and anal sex.

      Civil rights groups including the Human Rights Campaign urged the court to intervene, saying the laws are responsible for "stigmatizing gays and lesbians as outlaws" and "contribute to an atmosphere of hatred and violence" against gays.

      The case is Lawrence v. Texas, 02-102.


        World Fact Book  (CIA)]
      Cross-Indexed:

      New document Icon


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)