A rchive Date
[ 04-06-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Britain ]
|
[http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/06/03/102588-ap.html
British Parliament committee to hold inquiry into Iraq war decision
By ROBERT BARR
Tue, June 3, 2003
LONDON (AP) - A British parliamentary committee announced Tuesday that it intended to hold an inquiry into the government's decision to go to war with Iraq, as Prime Minister Tony Blair faced more pressure to explain claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
The House of Commons Foreign Relations Committee is likely to hold its inquiry in public. Its reports are usually published. Blair's office has resisted the idea of a broad independent inquiry and suggested it would favour an inquiry by the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee. But that committee reports to the prime minister, not to Parliament, and some legislators had pressed for a more open inquiry.
"Given its remit, I would not be surprised if the ISC did not already have this matter in hand," Blair's official spokesman had said earlier, briefing journalists on condition of anonymity. "We do not see the need for an independent inquiry of the nature that people are demanding."
Both inquiries would fall short of the full independent inquiry some are seeking. But although the Foreign Affairs Committee is dominated by Blair's Labour party, it has shown independence in past reports critical of the government.
The committee said it plans to take oral evidence from witnesses in June and publish a report in July.
Controversy has focused on a government dossier, published in September, outlining evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and plans to deploy them on 45 minutes' notice.
The existence of such weapons was Blair's crucial argument for joining the United States in military action, and pressure on him has grown as occupying British and U.S. forces in Iraq have failed to locate chemical, biological or nuclear arms.
More than 50 Labour legislators have signed a Commons motion drafted by Peter Kilfoyle, a former Labour defence minister, calling on the government to publish the evidence behind the dossier.
The Liberal Democrats, the third-largest party in Parliament, have called for a public inquiry. The main opposition Conservative party has not endorsed an inquiry, but has urged Blair to publish any additional evidence to support the claims made before the war.
"Here is probably the biggest issue for almost a generation where Parliament must be seen to be asserting itself," Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy told the BBC.
Kennedy, who had opposed British involvement in the war, said he believed the government's methods of presenting its case may have misled some people.
"I suspect that in presentational terms No. 10 (Blair's office) has gone for the most arresting presentation of the facts but that may in itself have had the very, very unfortunate effect of misleading certain people . . ."
Kenneth Clarke, a senior Conservative legislator who opposed military action in Iraq, said Parliament should debate the issues, which he saw as broader than the use or misuse of intelligence.
"The big issue is when did we decide to go to war?" Clarke told the BBC. "Did we support the Americans on the basis that they were going in for regime change . . . ? And was Parliament given a genuine reason when we were all told about the imminent threat from these weapons of mass destruction?"
 World Fact Book (CIA)]
|