WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 12-09-2005 ]
Category
[ Philosophy ]
sub-Categoy
[ Friedrich August Hayek ]

      [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism

      Scientism
      The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Scientism is a relatively newly coined word that refers to certain epistemologies based on science. The word has several different meanings:

      Scientism is a belief that scientific knowledge is the foundation of all wisdom and that, consequently, scientific argument should always be weighted more heavily than other forms of wisdom, particularly those which are not yet well described or justified from within the rational framework, or whose description fails to present itself in the course of a debate against a scientific argument. When used in a critique of science, it is dismissed by some scientists who maintain that all fields of inquiry should be subject to (and can ultimately be understood by) standard scientific methods of investigation.[1]

      It can be contrasted by doctrines like historicism which hold that there are certain "unknowable" truths. (Source for definition: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.)

      This viewpoint is typified by comments such as "Scientific research has demonstrated that substance x causes cancer in humans."

      As a form of dogma: "In essence, scientism sees science as the absolute and only justifiable access to the truth." [2]
      • Scientism can mean the values of humanism and Enlightenment informed by science. In this context, scientism is "a scientific worldview that encompasses natural explanations for all phenomena, eschews supernatural and paranormal speculations, and embraces empiricism and reason as the twin pillars of a philosophy of life appropriate for an Age of Science". (Source: Michael Shermer, The Shamans of Scientism, Scientific American, 2002)
      • Scientism may also refer to the way in which Marxists appropriated science (especially Darwin) as a justification for Karl Marx's theories, and how science replaced religion in Marxist communism.
      • Scientism can be used as a pejorative term, typically to reject the assertion that the application of scientific understanding to all phenomena produces the predicted results and is, therefore, a reliable guide to policy. It implies a reliance on science unbalanced by, and therefore susceptible to, unconscious influence by other life factors such as experiences, emotions, values, dogmas, beliefs, and motive. These influences, and, necessarily, the resulting science, are unscientific to the extent that they are unexamined in connection with the development of the science. In particular, in any area where secrets are known to be held, trust in science breaks down because influential facts are not being revealed, so no rational judgment can be fully trusted.
      • Scientism is sometimes seen, when used in its pejorative sense, as being a term deployed from an anti-science standpoint, despite the fact that some of those who have used it in this way claim to be supporters of science who are merely proposing a less reductionist view of science. "Reductionism" is intended by such as a critique of that scientific categorization which reduces individual variation into categories without regard for the consequences of such categorization, in particular upon those at the margins of such classification. In other words, scientism would be scientific analysis of populations which honors only prevalence and ignores outlyers, tending to create undesirable norms.

      'Scientism' may be used to imply an ignorance (or denial) of a relationship/disjunction between metaphysical and natural phenomena. This sense of the term comes close to Hannah Arendt's use of it in The Origins of Totalitarianism; in her view, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany had made the human condition a matter of scientific exactitude, and thus otherwise impossible moral or ethical questions (such as, "Can a man be worthless? And if so, can we euthanize him?") are easily resolved within the internally-consistent "scientific" methods of the state. In other words, the inhuman aspects of such totalitarian states cannot be said to be entirely unrelated to their adherence to pseudo-science as the ultimate arbiter of value.

      See also
      • Panglossianism
      • Pathological skepticism
      • Philosophy of science
      • Scientific method
      • Scientistic materialism
      • Scientistic

      References
      • "Science, Scientism, and Anti-Science in the Age of Preposterism", Susan Haack, Skeptical Inquier Magazine, 1997.
      • Sandra Harding, "Who Knows? Identities and Feminist Epistemology", in Joan E. Hartman and Ellen Messer-Davidow, eds., (En)gendering Knowledge, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, 1991, p. 109.
      • F.A. Hayek, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, Glencoe: The Free Press, 1952.

      External links
      • "Is Science Killing the soul?" Time Out New York (Edge Foundation, Inc.). 1999.
      • A discussion between Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins
      • Dawkins, Richard, "Is Science a Religion?" The Humanist. January/February 1997.
      • Newman, Nathan, "Big Pharma, Bad Science". The Nation. July 25, 2002.
      • "The Shamans of Scientism" by Michael Shermer, Scientific American, June, 2002

      Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism"
      Categories: Philosophical terminology | Science

      All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (see Copyrights for details).
      About Wikipedia Disclaimers ]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)