WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 07-12-2001 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/brodbeck.html

      They're Christians ...
      So don't mention the season
      By TOM BRODBECK - Winnipeg Sun
      December 7, 2001

      If you want to see a good example of political correctness gone absolutely mad, take a stroll down to the Manitoba Legislature and visit the "multicultural tree."

      It's a Christmas tree, actually - a Manitoba spruce with a bunch of decorations on it and an angel on top. But they don't call it a Christmas tree because they don't want to offend anyone who doesn't celebrate Christmas.

      In fact, government has quietly taken the word "Christmas" out of its political lexicon altogether.


      Christmas no longer appears in any provincial government news release and they haven't called the Christmas tree in the Legislature rotunda a "Christmas tree" in 12 years.

      Instead, they've reduced the Christmas season to some generic, one-size-fits-all, empty, politically correct time of year that everyone knows is Christmas, but no one wants to call it that. Christmas was obliterated from the official record in 1996.

      The last time the provincial government dared use the word was in 1995, when they invited Manitobans to come out and celebrate the "Christmas Lights Across Canada."

      Rubber-headed bureaucrats
      "It is our hope that these Christmas lights will shine as a symbol of the social and cultural values that are held by Canadians everywhere," said then-house speaker Louise Dacquay.

      A year later, Christmas was removed from the official record because some group of rubber-headed bureaucrats thought the province should be more sensitive to those who don't celebrate Christmas.

      Since 1996, "Christmas" has not been used in government news releases or by cabinet members in public speeches.
      "Christmas Lights Across Canada" was changed to "Lights Across Canada."

      As far as the provincial government is concerned, Christmas is dead.

      The only thing left is the annual "open house" at the Legislature in early December and a multicultural tree.

      "Merry Christmas" has practically became a slanderous well-wishing.

      Hanukkah honoured
      The government took it one step further this year with the unveiling of the multicultural tree yesterday.
      Again, no acknowledgment of Christmas.

      But for the first time that I can recall, the province officially honoured the Jewish celebration of Hanukkah. Why is that? Why is it acceptable to officially recognize one cultural celebration and not another?

      During yesterday's press conference, "Happy Hanukkah" was proudly displayed in the rotunda at the legislature.

      But there was no "Merry Christmas" banner. It's sheer hypocrisy.

      Politicians try so hard to be inclusive and sensitive to the feelings of minority groups that they end up apologizing for the cultural traditions of the majority.

      It's a guilt trip.
      Multicultural Minister Becky Barrett said this yesterday: "Manitoba's cultural diversity means we have many opportunities to explore, share and understand the heritage of our friends and neighbours through the celebration of our holiday traditions."

      But we don't.

      How can you share a tradition such as Christmas if we pretend it doesn't exist?

      This is the Christmas season, which most Manitobans celebrate, by the way, and I for one will not apologize for that.

      It's Hanukkah season, too, and people who celebrate Hanukkah shouldn't apologize for that, either. There's way too much apologizing going on around here.

      Tom Brodbeck is the Sun's city columnist. He can be reached by e-mail at tbrodbeck@wpgsun.com


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)