WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 31-05-2000 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [Meet abortion's new poster boys
      By MARIANNE MEED WARD
      Toronto Sun

      January 31, 2000
       
      By all accounts, Jean-Guy Tremblay is a nasty piece of work. He has pretended to be, at various times, a hockey player, lawyer and musician in order to attract women. Once he does, the abuse starts: choking, punching, breaking bones, threatening to kill.

      One woman testified that in three months of living with Tremblay, the longest she went without a beating was six days. A police officer in Calgary, where Tremblay now lives, said on a 1-10 scale of abusers, Tremblay is a 20.


      In 10 years Tremblay has been convicted of assaulting six women, most recently last month.


      Last week, the attorney general gave permission for a dangerous offender application against Tremblay. If granted, he could be jailed indefinitely.

      He's Exhibit A.


      Exhibit B is James Charles Kopp. He's a nasty piece of work, too. He is on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list and is the subject of a Canada-wide arrest warrant issued last week. Kopp is wanted for a shooting in Hamilton that shattered a man's elbow, and a shooting death in Buffalo. He's also a suspect in three other shootings, two in Canada, none fatal. A Winnipeg police officer involved in the case described Kopp as "a very dangerous individual."

      Say hello to the poster boys in the abortion wars.


      Tremblay, some of you will remember, is the man who convinced a Quebec judge in 1989 to grant an injunction preventing his then-fiancee, Chantale Daigle, from having an abortion. She had one anyway, but the injunction was subsequently overturned by the Supreme Court in a landmark ruling that decided the fetus has no rights under Canadian law.


      At the time, Daigle said she ended her seven-month relationship with Tremblay, and the resulting pregnancy, because he physically abused her.

      As for Kopp, the people he is suspected of shooting are all abortion doctors.


      With these two guys making headlines, it will be hard to have a sensible conversation about abortion, but such a conversation is desperately needed.

      Women can abort at any time for any reason and, thanks to prenatal technology, the list has grown far beyond "I was raped," or "I'm only 13," or "Now isn't really a good time."


      Wrong sex? Out it goes. Potential disability? Hey, better luck next time.


      Fertility drugs working a little too well? "Reduce" the extra fetus or two.


      Kid has the "gay" gene (if scientists ever identify one)? Or the recently discovered "rape" gene? Problem solved as fast as you can say D&C.


      And we fancy ourselves an enlightened, compassionate and tolerant society.


      It's long past time to restrict the whys and the whens of abortion. But if any government tries, you can be sure our two poster boys will be trotted out to justify leaving things as they are.


      I can hear it now. "Any law that criminalizes abortion will give ammunition to vigilantes." I don't think legislation will either pacify people who want to kill abortion doctors (if we ban abortion, they'll hunt the ban-breakers) or provoke them (they don't seem to need legal justification as it is). In any case, we should not craft an abortion law - or fail to do so - to protect ourselves from such people; we would do it to protect a fetus from us.


      "Any law restricting abortion will just give men, like Tremblay, another way to control women." Yes, apparently he did use pregnancy as a means to control and keep his female companions (mind you, in the history of the universe there's probably at least one woman who's done the same).

      Nevertheless, to say that no fetus should have rights because their fathers might abuse those rights is to build social policy on the basis of anecdotes. It's like arguing that because some parents beat their kids no parents should be allowed to raise children. They should all be shipped off to day care (don't get me started on that).


      Social policy should be built on shared values, with appropriate care taken to avoid potential abuses. Do we value human life? If we do, we need a law that says so, and never mind the poster boys.


      Marianne Meed Ward, a freelance writer with an interest in social and ethical issues, appears Mondays. Her e-mail is:pward@interlog.com


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)