WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 01-06-2003 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/05/31/100384-ap.html

      Weapons hunt in Iraq will shift to new sites
      By MATT KELLEY
      Sat, May 31, 2003

      WASHINGTON (AP) - A large new U.S. team heading into Iraq to search for weapons of mass destruction will shift its focus away from areas identified as suspicious sites before the war, the army general heading the effort said Friday.

      Instead, the searchers will focus on areas where documents, interviews with Iraqis and other new clues suggest biological or chemical weapons could be hidden, Maj.-Gen. Keith Dayton said.

      Dayton leaves Monday for Baghdad, where he will head the Iraq Survey Group. The team of about 1,400 experts from the United States, Great Britain and Australia will take over the weapons search from a smaller U.S. military team.

      The shift comes amid growing questions from allies and some members of U.S. Congress about why no chemical or biological weapons have been found. U.S. President George W. Bush said Iraq had chemical and biological weapons, as well as a nuclear weapons development program. Bush used the elimination of those programs as justification for waging war against Saddam Hussein's regime.

      Before the war, the United States drew up a list of more than 900 "suspect sites" where weapons of mass destruction or evidence of such programs might be found. Military teams have visited more than 200 of those sites without finding any actual weapons.
      The United States has found two equipment-filled trailers in northern Iraq that American intelligence agencies say were mobile biological weapons production facilities. Bush and other administration officials say the finds show Iraq did indeed have clandestine programs to make germ weapons.

      In response to questions about the credibility of U.S. intelligence, CIA Director George Tenet released a statement Friday defending his agency.

      "Our role is to call it like we see it, to tell policy-makers what we know, what we don't know, what we think, and what we base it on," he said. "The integrity of our process was maintained throughout and any suggestion to the contrary is simply wrong."

      Dayton, a top official in the Defence Intelligence Agency, said he remains convinced his team will find chemical and biological weapons in Iraq. He said he believed the information the United States had before the war indicating Iraq had the banned weapons and continues to believe that.

      "Do I think we will find something? Yeah, I kind of do," Dayton told reporters at a Pentagon news conference. "This is not necessarily going to be quick and easy, but it's going to be very thorough."

      Dayton said the Iraq Survey Group will include 200 to 300 searchers to fan out around Iraq to look for weapons, hundreds of experts to interrogate Iraqis, about 250 people to analyse documents and computer files at a regional base in Qatar and analysts to put the pieces together and figure out what they mean.

      Establishment of the group, announced last month, "represents a significant expansion of effort in the hunt for weapons of mass destruction," Dayton said.

      The group will begin a two-week transition period to take over the weapons hunt in Iraq no later than June 7, Dayton said.
      The group includes both military and civilian experts, including former United Nations weapons inspectors. Stephen Cambone, the Pentagon's top intelligence official, said Friday he did not know whether the United States would agree to have UN inspectors return to Iraq.

      Critics say the Bush administration should let UN inspectors back in.

      "Given the size and complexity of the task, it's unwise to turn down help from groups who have demonstrated expertise in this area," said Paul Kerr, an analyst at the Arms Control Association in Washington.

      Cambone and Dayton said they did not know why no chemical or biological weapons have been found so far. Dayton echoed comments by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld earlier in the week speculating that Iraq could have destroyed such weapons before or during the war.

      "These things could have been taken and buried. They could have been transferred. They could have been destroyed," Dayton said. "That doesn't mean they weren't there in the first place."

      The Iraq Survey Group also will investigate possible war crimes by Iraqis, links between Saddam's regime and terrorism and the fate of those missing in action or held prisoner since the 1991 Persian Gulf War.

      Dayton said those other missions make sense because his team will be interrogating Iraqis who may know about all of those issues and because his analysts will be able to pull together clues on those matters.

      "They're all interrelated," Dayton said. "We'll be connecting pieces that haven't been connected before."


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)