WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 12-11-2000 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ Canada ]

      [Why aboriginals ignore elections
      By ROSANNA DEERCHILD - Winnipeg Sun
      November 6, 2000
      It's time to vote. Again. Wasn't it just yesterday we had a provincial election in Manitoba? Geez, here I was just ridding my vocabulary of political jargon such as riding, campaign, platform and bullsh - uh - scratch that. It was exhausting. Wiped me out.

      Now I have to do it all over again on a larger scale. Is there no end?


      Ah, well. It's unavoidable, I suppose. People everywhere are talking about it.


      Who will lead Canada in this, the new millennium? They're calling it a two-party race. We could stay with the Liberals, with their financial responsibility and tax cuts. Or we could go with the Canadian Alliance's Time For a Change campaign.


      From coffee shops to water coolers, Canadians are debating the Federal Election 2000.


      In Indian country people are - well - pretty quiet. In fact, you could hear a pin drop in most aboriginal communities when it comes to the federal election --or any other election for that matter. Most reserve residents probably don't even know there's a federal election going on.


      That's because by and large, Aboriginal people don't vote.


      And just like everything, there are reasons for it. Aboriginal people were excluded - outlawed - from voting by the Indian Act that still governs our lives. As status Indians, my grand parents were not allowed to vote. Why? They weren't considered Canadian citizens.


      We got the vote some time in the late 1960s, long after women. But just because it's wiped from the books doesn't mean it's wiped from the consciousness. We were segregated for so long, many native people don't feel part of this country.


      Whether it's because of the physical separation of reserve living or the race line, they don't feel as though they have a stake, a voice, a piece of the national fabric. So why would they vote for the leader of that nation?


      Then there is the school of thinking that says we, as a nation, should not participate in the white man's political games. If we truly consider ourselves sovereign nations, they argue, it would be hypocritical to participate in another political system.


      The counter argument to that is that the Canadian system, political or otherwise, is here whether we like it or not. It overshadows everything in our lives. Indeed, it runs our lives. Until self-government is unilaterally declared, we have the opportunity to try and effect decisions of the majority.

      Whatever the argument, it's working to keep native people out.


      It's a frightening scenario when you consider both parties in this two-horse race are using aboriginal people, much like a carrot on a stick.


      No sooner had the race begun than the Liberals and the Canadian Alliance were pushing us out onto their precarious platforms.


      Before one side could finish bragging about how much they've given us in self-government negotiations, partnership agreements and dollars for residential school healing, the other one is throwing accusations of overspending and mismanagement.


      We are like the child in the middle of a bitter custody dispute. We're not even the favourite child, just the easiest to argue about.


      Of course they both have their "aboriginal policies." Neither addresses the problems of high rates of disease, poverty and death.


      One parent wants to continue throwing bits of candy in the form of negotiations that eat up dollars the other parents wants to cut off the allowance and ground us forever.


      And us, well, we just want to turn 18 and get the heck out of the house.


      Rosanna Deerchild can be reached by email at rdeerchild@aptn.ca


      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)