WordType Designs
Driven To Distractions©
The Sound of One Hand Clapping©


A rchive Date
[ 21-12-2002 ]
Category
[ International Relations ]
sub-Categoy
[ U.S ]

      [http://www.canoe.ca/TorontoNews/ts.ts-12-21-0011.html

      'Go pills' firestorm
      Pilot drug linked to friendly-fire deaths: ABC
      By CP
      Saturday, December 21, 2002

      OTTAWA -- An ABC News 20/20 report says amphetamines given to two U.S. fighter pilots may have contributed to a friendly-fire incident last April 18 that killed four Canadian soldiers and wounded eight more in Afghanistan.

      But reports by both Canadian and U.S. investigators said the Dexedrine pills, known on the street as speed or uppers, were not a factor in the attack on troops involved in a live-fire exercise near the Canadians' Kandahar base. And the Canadian commander in Afghanistan,
      Lt.-Col. Pat Stogran, said it's "beyond comprehension" how the Americans could have mistaken a night-time exercise for an attack from an altitude of 20,000 feet (6,500 metres).

      The ABC report says the "
      go pills" - given to the pilots to help them stay awake and alert on long missions - are illegal narcotics.

      "
      This is speed," said Dr. Robert DuPont, former White House drug czar. "This is where we got the phrase, speed kills."

      ABC obtained never-before-seen footage of the night-time attack from the F16s' targeting imagery, as well as audio tape of
      Maj. Harry Schmidt - "under the full influence of the amphetamine pills," says the report - declaring he is taking groundfire. "I've got some men on a road with a piece of artillery firing at us," he said. "I am rolling in self-defence."

      Schmidt had been told to hold fire by controllers in an AWACS command and control aircraft but says he was convinced he and his senior wingman,
      Maj. Bill Umbach, were under attack. "Bombs away," the flight recording said. "Cranking left."

      It is only after Schmidt drops the 250-kilo bomb that he is told it is not the enemy. "
      Bossman, disengage friendlies, Khandahar," the tape goes on to say.
      Schmidt and Umbach, both of the Illinois Air National Guard, were blamed by U.S. and Canadian inquiries, which said while there were some shortcomings in the command structure, Schmidt was too quick on the draw.

      The ABC report says the amphetamines may have affected his decision-making ability. The pair have a preliminary hearing at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana on Jan. 13. They face up to 64 years in prison if convicted on charges of involuntary manslaughter and assault.


      The Canadian board of inquiry said "go pills" have been used for more than 30 years. "
      Blood and urine tests and a drug screen done after the incident were normal for both pilots, with the only remarkable result being a low level positive in Major (name deleted) drug screen that confirmed his stated use of the pills," the Canadian report said.

      MEDICALLY CLEARED
      "In accordance with set policies, (the two pilots) were ground tested and both were without side-effects and were medically cleared for operational use of 'go pills,'" it said. "It was the assessment of the CIB medical adviser that the operational use of the 'go pill' had no adverse effect on the (pilots)."

      In an interview with The Canadian Press yesterday, Stogran said he and other members of the 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, just want justice to take its course. The colonel said he's "irked" by the tactics of the pilots' lawyers, including the release of selective segments of transcripts from inquiry interviews with Canadian soldiers suggesting weapons were fired into the air.
      "
      Unfortunately, the families have to bear the brunt of these spurious revelations that are coming out," Stogran said.

      "
      We just want justice to take its course. We're not out for vengeance or revenge or anything like that. Negligence is negligence, whether it's at 20,000 feet or had it occurred within the battle group."

      The only tracers going up would have been ricochets, Stogran said. And a helicopter pilot flying in the area at the time said those were visible for only 1,000 feet (330 metres), at most. "
      As if a fighter aircraft at 20,000 feet would even see the terminal effects of a round at that range," said the colonel. "The tracer would have burnt out "I find it incomprehensible that the company would have been sitting on the ground shooting up into the air."

      BACKBLAST
      Anti-tank guns - the largest weapons on-site - could not be fired at a significant upward angle because the backblast would threaten lives on the ground.

      To pilots at that altitude, the Canadian troops would have appeared a stone's throw away from what was unmistakably a coalition airfield. There was a detainee compound in the middle of the Kandahar base that was lit up like a football field every night. Supply flights coming in to the base would navigate by those lights from 80 km out.


      The Tarnac Puhl training area was so close to the airfield, troops would sometimes walk it, out and back.


      Platoon- or company-sized exercises were conducted at the former
      al-Qaida training site daily. And soldiers wore infrared strobes as well as glint tape on their helmets so they would be visible to allied aircraft.

      "
      There was one quick-reaction force mission where the Spectre gunships actually talked one of our platoons onto an objective at night using their infrared signature," Stogran said.

      World Fact Book (CIA)]


Some pages may require Adobe Acrobat Reader



Copyright and Fair Use Information: The contents of this web site is protected by international copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever, if for the purpose of resale or solicitation of a donation. The essays included here, may be reproduced only if: 1)They are not altered in any way; 2) reproductions must be accompanied by this copyright page ; and 3) it is given freely and without charge.
Fair use: The fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in above sections, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered include : (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market value of the copyrighted work.

Home | About Narrative? |Contact
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved
HAG122125 (1998 -2026)